Recommendatory base for the delivery of specialized medical care to patients with spine and spinal cord injury in Russia: Subject field review
Hirurgia Pozvonochnika, ISSN: 2313-1497, Vol: 18, Issue: 4, Page: 41-54
2021
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
Review Description
Objective. To evaluate the composition and content of the recommendatory base for delivery of specialized medical care to patients with spine and spinal cord injury on the territory of the Russian Federation. Material and Methods. The published recommendations specifying the content of the diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation and preventive components of the provision of medical care to patients with spine and spinal cord injury were reviewed. The search for information was carried out in the eLibrary.ru bibliographic resource, documents of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, publications of specialized medical professional non-profit organizations, and other manuals. The depth of information selection was 18 years (since 2003). The review was prepared following the PRISMA-ScR and PRISMA-S guidelines. Results. The current Russian recommendatory base in the field under consideration includes articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals, practical guidelines, regulatory documents and eight clinical guidelines prepared by the Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia and by the Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia approved or submitted for approval by the Ministry of Health. A significant degree of cross-use of information has been established, in general covering a wide range of diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation and preventive issues. Conclusion. Most of the Russian recommendations on the provision of medical care to patients with spine and spinal cord injury do not have high strength, are not based on high-certainty evidence, are general in nature, especially in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic tactics, and are created without consideration of the medical care delivery setting. The methodology for their development is reported extremely poorly.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know