The influence of interstitial cells of Cajal loss and aging on slow wave conduction velocity in the human stomach
Physiological Reports, ISSN: 2051-817X, Vol: 8, Issue: 24, Page: e14659
2021
- 15Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef7
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Loss of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) has been associated with gastric dysfunction and is also observed during normal aging at ~13% reduction per decade. The impact of ICC loss on gastric slow wave conduction velocity is currently undefined. This study correlated human gastric slow wave velocity with ICC loss and aging. High-resolution gastric slow wave mapping data were screened from a database of 42 patients with severe gastric dysfunction (n = 20) and controls (n = 22). Correlations were performed between corpus slow wave conduction parameters (frequency, velocity, and amplitude) and corpus ICC counts in patients, and with age in controls. Physiological parameters were further integrated into computational models of gastric mixing. Patients: ICC count demonstrated a negative correlation with slow wave velocity in the corpus (i.e., higher velocities with reduced ICC; r =.55; p =.03). ICC count did not correlate with extracellular slow wave amplitude (p =.12) or frequency (p =.84). Aging: Age was positively correlated with slow wave velocity in the corpus (range: 25–74 years; r =.32; p =.02). Age did not correlate with extracellular slow wave amplitude (p =.40) or frequency (p =.34). Computational simulations demonstrated that the gastric emptying rate would increase at higher slow wave velocities. ICC loss and aging are associated with a higher slow wave velocity. The reason for these relationships is unexplained and merit further investigation. Increased slow wave velocity may modulate gastric emptying higher, although in gastroparesis other pathological factors must dominate to prevent emptying.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098079630&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14659; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355992; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14814/phy2.14659; https://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14659; https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14814/phy2.14659
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know