Steroid analysis in clinical routine diagnostics - discussing crucial questions
LaboratoriumsMedizin, ISSN: 1439-0477, Vol: 41, Issue: 2, Page: 73-79
2017
- 4Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Quantitative steroid analysis via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is applicable to clinical routine diagnostics by now, substituting immunoassays due to its superior selectivity and comparable sensitivity. Multiplexed assays covering a multitude of analytes represent the gold standard in this regard. There are commercially available kits which are easily adapted to individual LC-MS/MS systems required. Prior to and even after their appearance, in-house method development represented the flexible alternative in terms of solving specific analytical problems or focusing on a narrower steroid profile while maximizing sensitivity and high throughput applicability. In this work, commercial assays and in-house methods are discussed in relation to a benchmark LC-MS/MS method. Thereby, prerequisites and results are compared. Furthermore, the effect of concomitant medication on steroid assays was tested and requirements regarding quality assurance in routine steroid analysis are discussed. Most of the different commercially available or in-house LC-MS/MS methods for steroid analysis show a good or reasonable agreement of results. However, the harmonization in the methodology of mass spectrometric assays has to be improved to further reduce their variability. Such a procedure would facilitate the performance of diagnostic tests that involve the measurement of steroid hormones by the tremendous improvement of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know