Possibilistic and Probabilistic Logic under Coherence: Default Reasoning and System P
Mathematica Slovaca, ISSN: 1337-2211, Vol: 65, Issue: 4, Page: 863-890
2015
- 27Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Some results on coherence in probabilistic and in possibilistic frameworks are presented in order to deal with nonmonotonic reasoning. Moreover, we extend these results to conditional decomposable measures. We deal with entailment and prove that it satisfies the axiomatization of System P by referring to conditional necessities or to specific conditional decomposable measures (which include conditional probability). Finally, we study some aspects concerning a notion of irrelevance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945275765&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ms-2015-0060; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2015-0060/html; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2015-0060/pdf; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2015-0060/xml; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ms.2015.65.issue-4/ms-2015-0060/ms-2015-0060.xml
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know