Progress in understanding the factors regulating reversibility of long-term potentiation
Reviews in the Neurosciences, ISSN: 0334-1763, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: 51-68
2001
- 97Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations97
- Citation Indexes97
- 97
- CrossRef74
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Review Description
Over the past two decades there has been a progressive understanding of the properties and mechanisms underlying long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic efficacy, a putative mechanism for learning and memory storage in the brain. Although LTP is remarkable for its stability, recent work has provided evidence that various manipulations can disrupt LTP if applied shortly after its induction. This kind of reversal of synaptic strength from the potentiated state to pre-LTP levels is termed depotentiation. Depotentiation of LTP is effectively induced by low-frequency afferent stimulation (1-5 Hz), brief periods of hypoxia, application of adenosine receptor agonists and brief cooling shocks. The examples of depotentiation described to date are input specific, and not differently expressed during development. The mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon remain to be fully characterized, although some possibilities are dependent on NMDA receptor activation, the increases in intracellular Ca, and altered states of protein kinases or phosphatases. In this review, we summarize the recent data concerning putative depotentiation mechanisms and the implications of this phenomenon in the mechanisms of "forgetting", and discuss the prevention of saturation of the storage capacity of a neuronal network.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035127308&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/revneuro.2001.12.1.51; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11236065; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/REVNEURO.2001.12.1.51/html; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/revneuro.2001.12.1/revneuro.2001.12.1.51/revneuro.2001.12.1.51.xml; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/revneuro.2001.12.1/revneuro.2001.12.1.51/revneuro.2001.12.1.51.pdf
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know