Relativeness of legal subjectivity: Autonomous machines and emergent swarms
Zeitschrift fur Rechtssoziologie, ISSN: 2366-0392, Vol: 37, Issue: 1, Page: 8-25
2017
- 4Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Legal subjectivity is relative. Legal systems are free to recognize non-human legal subjects and to define their legal status. Criteria for the recognition of non-human entities as legal subjects are their individual autonomy and their social capacity. Using this relative concept, the legal subjectivity of autonomous machines and emerging swarm behavior can be critically discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85030235495&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-2017-0002; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfrs-2017-0002/html; http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zfrs.2017.37.issue-1/zfrs-2017-0002/zfrs-2017-0002.xml; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zfrs.2017.37.issue-1/zfrs-2017-0002/zfrs-2017-0002.xml
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know