Preliminary data on biochemical remission of acromegaly after somatostatin analogs withdrawal
European Journal of Endocrinology, ISSN: 0804-4643, Vol: 158, Issue: 1, Page: 19-25
2008
- 44Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes43
- 43
- CrossRef38
- Clinical Citations1
- 1
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
Objective: It is still unknown whether prolonged treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSTa) may use a long-lasting disease remission in GH-secreting adenomas after drug discontinuation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the evolution of GH/IGF-I secretion and tumor mass after SSTa withdrawal in patients affected by acromegaly. Patients and Design: A total of 27 patients with acromegaly (12 de novo and 15 previously operated) were treated with SSTA for a median period of 48 months and considered optimally controlled in hormonal and neuroradiological terms. None of them were previously irradiated. Methods: Basal GH, post-glucose GH nadir, IGF-I, clinical signs/ symptoms, and metabolic parameters were evaluated after 12-16 weeks from drug withdrawal. Only patients who met the current criteria for disease remission remained in drug suspension being periodically re-evaluated for biochemical/-clinical data and neuroradiological imaging. Results: After 12-16 weeks withdrawal, 15 of the 27 patients had disease relapse and restarted SSTa, while 12 were considered 'in disease remission' (44% of total). Glucose metabolism improved in both euglycemic and diabetic patients after short-term SSTa discontinuation. Only one of the ten patients who reached 24 weeks withdrawal showed biochemical disease recurrence. On the whole, five of the patients still in remission after 6 months have already prolonged the follow-up over 12 months (median: 24 months), without clinical and biochemical/ neuroradiological evidence of disease recurrence. Conclusions: These preliminary data indicate a successful withdrawal of SSTa at least in a subset of well-responsive patients with acromegaly and challenge the previously held concept that medical therapy is always a lifelong requirement. © 2008 Society of the European Journal of Endocrinology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=38949140254&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/eje-07-0488; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18166813; http://www.eje-online.org/cgi/doi/10.1530/EJE-07-0488; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/1136911#eval623608; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1136911.623608; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/1136911#eval594013; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1136911.594013; https://academic.oup.com/ejendo/article/158/1/19/6675994; http://www.eje-online.org/content/158/1/19; http://www.eje-online.org/content/158/1/19.abstract; http://www.eje-online.org/content/158/1/19.full; http://www.eje-online.org/content/158/1/19.full.pdf; http://f1000.com/1136911#eval594013; http://f1000.com/1136911#eval623608
BioScientifica
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know