Further examination of log P -based procedures to estimate biological occupational exposure limits
Journal of Occupational Health, ISSN: 1348-9585, Vol: 60, Issue: 6, Page: 453-457
2018
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Objectives: To test the reliability of the procedures (described in a previous article) for estimation of biological occupational exposure limits (BOELs). Methods: Data on four organic solvents (styrene, ethyl benzene, isopropyl alcohol and tetrachloroethylene ) were obtained from recent publications and added to previously cited data for 10 organic solvents. Regression analysis was used for statistical evaluation. Results and Discussion: The previously reported results obtained using 10 solvents were reproduced by the analysis with 14 solvents. Repeated randomized division of the 14 sets into two subgroups of equal size followed by statistical comparisons did not show a significant difference between two regression lines. This reproducibility suggests that the procedures used to estimate BOELs may be applicable across many solvents, and this may be of particular benefit for protecting the health of workers who work with skin-penetrating solvents.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057559163&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1539/joh.2018-0046-oa; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058609; https://academic.oup.com/joh/article/60/6/453/7250954; https://dx.doi.org/10.1539/joh.2018-0046-oa; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1539/joh.2018-0046-OA; https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/joh/60/6/60_2018-0046-OA/_article/-char/en/; https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/joh/60/6/60_2018-0046-OA/_article/-char/ja/
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know