Governance and sustainable development: Participation of local stakeholder in clean development mechanism projects in Brazil
Cuadernos de Geografia: Revista Colombiana de Geografia, ISSN: 2256-5442, Vol: 27, Issue: 2, Page: 227-241
2018
- 8Citations
- 588Usage
- 32Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article examines the participation of local stakeholders and the contribution to sustainable development of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects in Brazil. A mixed textual analysis methodology (qualitative and quantitative) was used to assess 341 Project Design Documents. The results show that most CDM projects described some benefit for sustainable development, as well as indicated that local stakeholders were consulted. However, it was not possible to identify participatory decision-making mechanisms. The study also shows the importance of adopting rules at the local level to strengthen the scope of the two objectives studied.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061253307&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v27n2.66336; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/rcg/article/view/66336; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-215X2018000200227&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-215X2018000200227&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-215X2018000200227; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-215X2018000200227; https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v27n2.66336
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know