Additive manufacturing of 3D batteries: a perspective
Journal of Materials Research, ISSN: 2044-5326, Vol: 37, Issue: 9, Page: 1535-1546
2022
- 16Citations
- 69Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of battery materials with complex geometries. When battery components can take arbitrary form factors, opportunities emerge for creating electrode configurations with improved power density, reduced weight, and excellent mechanical stability. We provide a perspective on recent progress in AM of 3D batteries, discussing relevant techniques, materials, designs, and applications. We highlight advantages and limitations associated with battery electrodes fabricated by direct ink writing, fused deposition modeling, vat photopolymerization, and selective laser sintering. Additionally, we discuss optimal geometries and compatible materials for anode, cathode, and electrolyte of fully 3D batteries. To increase transparency and utility in the field, we suggest a standardized set of reporting metrics for 3D batteries. Finally, we identify key opportunities for implementation where 3D batteries can provide critical advantages such as shape conformability and the ability to serve as multifunctional or structural components. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know