Experimental studies of mechanical properties of implants for plasty of hernial defects
PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin, ISSN: 2226-1869, Vol: 2019, Issue: 2, Page: 172-180
2019
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The success of modern hernioplasty is associated with the introduction of synthetic endoprostheses (mesh implants) from various polymers. However, a significant number of complications arising, including those involving the erroneous application of an implant, make it necessary to get a deeper understanding of mechanisms of not only biological but also mechanical behaviors of structures of this type During the work, a technique is proposed to assess deformation properties of mesh implants made based on foam and polyester. These implants are used in surgical operations with non-stretching hernioplasty, which are now most common. As a result, tests were conducted to study the deformation of the mesh implant type SPMM, TCM, Reperen, TEC under the influence of abdominal pressure under quasi-static conditions. In order to conduct the study we completed the development of the proposed methodology. The data of the deformation dependence on intra-abdominal pressure were obtained. As a result, a research methodology and a mathematical model have been developed that describe the mechanical behavior of the mesh implant installed in the abdominal cavity under conditions of non-stretching hernioplasty, which is under the influence of intra-abdominal pressure. The analysis of mechanical behavior for various sizes of working areas of a reticular implant under the conditions of various values of intraperitoneal pressures in a range from low (2 kPa) to high (20 kPa) pressures is carried out. The obtained results allow an assessment of the mechanical behavior of implants and their applicability for a clinical case depending on defect sizes in living tissues and expected intra-abdominal pressures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070650015&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.15593/perm.mech/2019.2.14; http://vestnik.pstu.ru/get/_res/fs/file.pdf/8604/%DD%EA%F1%EF%E5%F0%E8%EC%E5%ED%F2%E0%EB%FC%ED%EE%E5+%E8%F1%F1%EB%E5%E4%EE%E2%E0%ED%E8%E5+%EC%E5%F5%E0%ED%E8%F7%E5%F1%EA%E8%F5+%F1%E2%EE%E9%F1%F2%E2+%FD%ED%E4%EE%EF%F0%EE%F2%E5%E7%EE%E2+%E8%F1%EF%EE%EB%FC%E7%F3%E5%EC%FB%F5+%EF%F0%E8+%EF%EB%E0%F1%F2%E8%EA%E5+%E3%F0%FB%E6%E5%E2%FB%F5+%E4%E5%F4%E5%EA%F2%EE%E2file.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.15593/perm.mech/2019.2.14
PNRPU Publishing House
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know