The secret of the world: On global and local histories in Latin America
Historia da Historiografia, ISSN: 1983-9928, Vol: 13, Issue: 32, Page: 147-184
2020
- 8Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article examines the repercussion of global history on Latin American historiography. Like in the central countries, the so-called global turn has gained great prominence in the region in recent years. This article argues that the adoption of this approach presents a paradoxical feature. While world histories, the core of the field in the U.S and British academy, have aroused little interest, the opposite has occurred with relational approaches such as transnational, connected or entangled history. Significant scholarly and geopolitical issues lie underneath such unequal reception. This essay reviews the relationship between Latin American global historiographical traditions and the new universal histories; the research agendas that are taking shape in the continent around this approach toward the past; and, more succinctly, drawing on two important books on the subject, the implications of global analysis models in the rewriting of the national histories of Chile and the United States.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091372889&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.15848/hh.v13i32.1492; https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1492; https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/download/1492/841; https://dx.doi.org/10.15848/hh.v13i32.1492
Sociedade Brasileria de Teoria e Historia de Historiografia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know