On health needs: The concept labyrinth
Cadernos de Saude Publica, ISSN: 1678-4464, Vol: 34, Issue: 6, Page: e00113717
2018
- 5Citations
- 1,363Usage
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study aims to reflect on the intertwining of certain key ideas about what we call “health” within the hegemonic biomedical paradigm: health, disease, is based on the philosophical contributions of Heller and Wiggins on needs; on the discussion of some authors, especially Canguilhem, about health and illness; and Collins’ sociology of expertise. After pointing out some of the conundrums that arise from the conceptual fluidity of the topics abovementioned, we present a path forward, based on Collins’ proposals about the role of experts in political arguments, to resituate the discussion on health needs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048957996&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00113717; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29947659; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018000603001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00113717; https://www.scielo.br/j/csp/a/9PkHPdLZ7hQxYT5tGB5qYDP/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know