Vitality of lichens under different light climates in an araucaria forest (Pró-mata rs, south Brazil) as determined by chlorophyll fluorescence
Acta Botanica Brasilica, ISSN: 1677-941X, Vol: 32, Issue: 2, Page: 188-197
2018
- 4Citations
- 1,449Usage
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The vitality of 64 lichen species (107 individual lichen thalli) growing under different light climates in an Araucaria forest in South Brazil was analyzed by chlorophyll fluorescence. Study sites were grouped according to their local light availability under full sunlight (about 2200 µmol m s): 1 = low light, up to 20 µmol m s; 2 = medium light, 20 to 100 µmol m s; and 3 = high light, more than 100 µmol m s. Maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, as shown by F/F of dark-adapted samples, was mainly between 0.3 and 0.7, with extremes of below 0.1 and up to 0.85. On average, yields were highest with low light availability (0.66). Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly different from each other, but groups 1 and 3, as well as groups 2 and 3 were. After dark adaptation, lichens were exposed to different light intensities by means of a chlorophyll fluorometer. The results show that low light-adapted lichens exhibit the highest sensitivity to excess light, as was also indicated by the data for non-photochemical quenching. Thus, shade-adapted lichens are obviously well protected from possible damage caused by excess light, which is important when exposed to sun flecks.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042626318&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062017abb0187; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-33062018000200188&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abb/v32n2/0102-3306-abb-0102-33062017abb0187.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-33062018000200188&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-33062018000200188; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-33062018000200188; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-33062018005001101&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-33062018005001101&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-33062018005001101; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-33062018005001101; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062017abb0187; https://www.scielo.br/j/abb/a/DgVytsPj5Fq4JymRB9spm9r/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know