AHP in nonlinear scaling: from two-envelope problem to modeling by predictors
Production, ISSN: 0103-6513, Vol: 31, Page: 1-10
2021
- 4Citations
- 103Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Paper aims: Extending the AHP abilities to new areas from explaining the famous Two-Envelope paradox to finding priorities as functions of auxiliary variables is suggested. Originality: The proposed innovative and advantageous approach permits to find the non-constant priorities via regression modeling for the exponential or Cobb-Douglas production functions. Research method: Transforming the ratio scale into the additive or logarithmic scales, which correspond to the multiplicative utility function, opens new possibilities in the multiple-criteria decision making. Main findings: Two-Envelop problem is resolved, priority vectors are presented as functions by auxiliary variables, preferences are predicted and profiled by predictors. Implications for theory and practice: The suggested techniques open novel possibilities of multiple-criteria decisions helping to researchers and managers to discover useful features of priority behavior due to the demographic, socioeconomic, or technical properties of the compared alternatives, and to find optimal solutions for individual customers.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107857535&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210007; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132021000100501&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/prod/v31/0103-6513-prod-31-e20210007.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132021000100501&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0103-65132021000100501&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132021000100501; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0103-65132021000100501; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210007; https://www.scielo.br/j/prod/a/f7GShBpMQk4MYNjP4HJhfCs/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know