Drought tolerance evaluated in common bean genotypes
Ciencia e Agrotecnologia, ISSN: 1981-1829, Vol: 43, Issue: 0
2019
- 10Citations
- 2,123Usage
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Given the impact of climate issues and their direct influence on agricultural production, the aim of this study was to identify superior genotypes of dry edible common bean under water deficit. Thus, 30 common bean genotypes were evaluated under controlled greenhouse conditions in a randomized block experimental design with split plots and four replications; the plots consisted of the water treatments (irrigated and water deficit) and the split plots consisted of the genotypes. The results showed genetic variability among the accessions evaluated, and in spite of significant reduction in grain yield and stomatal conductance under water deficit, these two traits showed significant, positive correlation and are able to be applied in early selection of genotypes under this stress condition. Another important response was in relation to the genotypes SER-16, SEN 92, FT Paulistinha, Carioca Precoce, IAC Imperador, and SXB 410, which showed the best yield performances in the two water treatments applied. They can be widely used in breeding programs for development of new cultivars, especially aiming at drought tolerance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067560900&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054201943001719; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542019000100211&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cagro/v43/1981-1829-cagro-43-e001719.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542019000100211&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1413-70542019000100211&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542019000100211; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1413-70542019000100211; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054201943001719; https://www.scielo.br/j/cagro/a/QV54vkL6SrX4thxcMk5qFFv/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know