Content analysis of the global alliance for nursing and midwifery discussion forum: An online community of practice
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, ISSN: 1518-8345, Vol: 29, Page: e3431
2021
- 3Citations
- 374Usage
- 41Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: to examine the usage and content of the Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery (GANM) discussion forum in relation to nursing and midwifery education and practice. Method: a qualitative conventional content analysis was performed. Subject lines from 1689 discussion board threads were extracted and used as the unit of analysis. A-priori codes were developed based on topical relevance (e.g. maternal health) and typical discussion board usage (e.g. announcing educational opportunities). Emerging codes were further identified while coding the data (e.g. infectious diseases). Results: the GANM discussion forum was used most frequently for information exchange (43.8%), such as dissemination of new information on evidence-based practice, and to announce educational opportunities (24.8%). The most frequently discussed topics were nursing (14.2%; e.g. the role of nurses in primary care, nursing education, etc.) and maternal health (13.8%; e.g. postpartum care, maternal mortality, etc.). Infectious diseases were discussed in 9% of threads, 40% of which concerned the current coronavirus pandemic. Conclusion: findings reinforce the utility of the GANM as a platform for professional development and continuing education. As a platform for disseminating empirical research, the GANM can be leveraged to have an influence on real-world, evidence-based practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114858084&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4878.3431; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495185; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692021000100371&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692021000100371&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-11692021000100371&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692021000100371; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-11692021000100371; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692021000100371&lng=en&tlng=en; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-11692021000100371&lng=en&tlng=en; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692021000100371; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-11692021000100371; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4878.3431; https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/hCrZ4RJ876CKxCTc95cnk5b/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know