Morphometric and gut microbial evaluation of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed on different levels of Moringa oleifera
Brazilian Journal of Biology, ISSN: 1678-4375, Vol: 84, Page: e261574
2024
- 2Citations
- 42Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In current study, different feeding levels of Moringa oleifera formulated diet was compared to analyze the growth performance, feed conversion ratio, feed conversion efficiency and gut microbiology of Oreochromis niloticus. The study was comprised of four treatment groups including 4%, 8% and 12% Moringa oleifera and one control group which was devoid of Moringa leaves. The experimental trial was conducted at the Zoology laboratory of Pakistan Institute of Applied and Social Sciences, (PIASS) Kasur. The physicochemical parameters of water such as temperature, dissolve oxygen, pH, total dissolved solids and salinity in all aquaria were found non-significantly different from each other. In control condition T1, the average weight gain was 14.89±16.90a grams, while average length gain was 11.52±7.444a cm. However, the total viable count on Eosin methylene blue was 7.4×10, 5.8×10 on Tryptic soy agar and 5.8×10on Nutrient agar. In T2, the average weight gain was 16.22±16.09b grams and average length gain was 12.97±7.79b cm. The total viable count on Eosin methylene blue was 7×10, 5.5×10 on Tryptic soy agar and 5.8×10on Nutrient agar. In T3, the average weight gain was 37.88±27.43c grams, while the average length gain was recorded as 16.48±12.56c cm. However, the total viable count for treatment 3 was 6.4×10 on Eosin methylene blue, 4.8×10 on Tryptic soy agar and 5.2×10on Nutrient agar. In T4, the average weight gain was 44.22±31.67d grams, while the average length gain was 15.25±10.49d cm. The total viable count was 4.3×10on Eosin methylene blue, 3.1×10 on Tryptic soy agar and 3.8×10 on Nutrient agar. The effect of Moringa oleifera on the growth of Oreochromis niloticus was found to be significant and 12% Moringa extract showed maximum length and weight gain and minimum feed conversion ratio with the least microbial count in fish intestine.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132453341&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.261574; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703630; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842024000100336&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842024000100336&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1519-69842024000100336&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842024000100336; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1519-69842024000100336; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.261574; https://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/a/zMvQ4hs8SrKsWkFJvyWrHjC/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know