Good agricultural practices for milk production: Diagnosis and non-compliances adjustment
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, ISSN: 1678-4162, Vol: 71, Issue: 6, Page: 2075-2084
2019
- 1Citations
- 1,788Usage
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study reports the development and validation of a novel diagnostic tool, based on the FAO and IDF Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practicë. Sixty-two dairy farms over six different regions within the State of Rio Grande do Sul were selected, evaluated and ranked, from January 2014 to March 2017; as part of the PROTAMBO-Dairying Technology Transfer Project (EMBRAPA). Results indicated that the proposed diagnostic tool was significantly consistent among different field evaluators, meeting trueness validation parameter for ISO/IEC 17025 validation requirement. Binomial distribution of probabilities of positive changes showed significant kind of metric evolution for the treatment group when compared to the control, in addition to significant consistency. Approximated t-Student test for comparison of the means of GAP non-compliances demonstrated significant improvements for the treatment group relative to the control. This novel approach could assist in overcoming existing and emerging GAP challenges to maximize dairy quality.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078728444&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10401; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000602075&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abmvz/v71n6/0102-0935-abmvz-71-06-2075.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000602075&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-09352019000602075&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000602075; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-09352019000602075; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10401; https://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/a/3KbC4ycmxvPRT5MT8NQ33Dp/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know