Pododermatitis macroscopic and microscopic characterization related to industrial classification of chicken feet for human consumption
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, ISSN: 1678-4162, Vol: 71, Issue: 3, Page: 797-804
2019
- 2,184Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The aim of this study was to identify and classify pododermatitis in broilers, comparing the microscopic lesions with the macroscopic aspects used by the Sanitary Inspection. Broiler chicken feet were collected at a Poultry slaughterhouse under Sanitary Inspection, after classification according to the exportation standards. The chicken feet were randomly selected in each group, 30 feet type A, 30 feet type B and 33 feet type C. For the histopathological analysis, scores were developed according to the severity of the lesions, varying from 0 to 2. There was association (Chi-square, P < 0.05) between the macroscopic classification (A, B and C) and histological changes (0, 1 and 2). The A classification differed significantly (ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer, P < 0.05) from the B and C classifications regarding the histopathological scores observed. There was no difference in feet lesions that justified the separation between the feet classified in B and C, since both presented a linear delimitation of the lesions, suggesting superficiality and restriction to the keratinized epithelium. Therefore, the use of the feet for human consumption after mechanical removal of the footpad lesions is suggested since the product does not pose risks to the consumer.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068968167&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10615; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300797&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abmvz/v71n3/0102-0935-abmvz-71-03-797.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300797&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-09352019000300797&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352019000300797; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-09352019000300797; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10615; https://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/a/NKfmf58j4wFRrs6RMphx6Cc/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know