Development and validation of a tool for competence assessment of the insert of the intrauterine device
Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil, ISSN: 1519-3829, Vol: 22, Issue: 2, Page: 283-295
2022
- 2Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objectives: to develop and validate an instrument to assess the professional competence of nurses in the insertion of the intrauterine device (IUD). Methods: methodological study, developed in three stages: 1) tool development (Theoretical procedures); 2) evaluation of the tool by experts and judgment of the initially proposed items (Appearance validation and content validation); 3) test of the version resulting from the assessment by experts and assessment of internal consistency (Analytical procedures). Ten judges participated in the face and content validation, among obstetric nurses and gynecologists/obstetricians from the Sofia Feldman Hospital in Belo Horizonte (MG), while 38 nursing residency students were evaluated using the test tool, in the last stage of the study. Calculations of the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were performed as psychometric measures. Results: the initial tool covered 39 items. No item obtained CVI<0.8; however, through suggestions from the judges, items were merged, totaling 34 items. The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this version was 0.828. Conclusion: the tool developed is valid and reliable. It is believed that the implementation of this tool will contribute to the training of professionals and the improvement of knowledge, behaviors, and skills in nursing consultations with a focus on reproductive planning with an emphasis on the insertion of the IUD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135534933&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9304202200020006; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-38292022000200283&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-38292022000200283&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1519-38292022000200283&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-38292022000200283; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1519-38292022000200283; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9304202200020006; https://www.scielo.br/j/rbsmi/a/wvZQK6dFSj6sV7C5WfPKMfg/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know