YouTube™ and oral lichen planus: an appraisal of the educational quality of information
Brazilian Oral Research, ISSN: 1807-3107, Vol: 35, Page: e006
2021
- 9Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef5
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
The objective of this study was to analyze the quality of videos on oral lichen planus (OLP) available in YouTubeTM. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted by searching the video sharing platform YouTube™. Videos aimed at clarifying the etiological and clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognosis of OLP were included. A total of 481 videos were retrieved and 37 were included in the study according to the selection criteria established. Most of the videos evaluated (86.5%; n = 32) were produced by independent users. The average reliability was 1.8 and quality assessment classified only three videos (8.1%) as having good/excellent quality. A significant correlation was observed between the length of the video analyzed and its quality and reliability (p < 0.05), as well as between the reliability and usefulness of the video (p = 0.03). YouTubeTM has become a leading source of information for the general population. However, a significant number of these videos have a low quality. Students, professionals, and healthcare providers must be more actively involved in providing clear, accurate, and reliable evidence-based information in an accessible language in order to enable significant improvement in patient care delivery.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096407486&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0006; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206779; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100205&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100205&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1806-83242021000100205&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100205; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1806-83242021000100205; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0006; https://www.scielo.br/j/bor/a/VtVDDxWTMdwZ7W5tYk6dq9s/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know