Kinanthropometry in brazilian physical education (1970s): A new knowledge perspective for this field
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, ISSN: 1980-0037, Vol: 22, Page: 1-11
2020
- 1Citations
- 251Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
– The aim of the present study is to understand the constitution of kinanthropometry as scientific disciplinary field in the 1970s in Brazil. Therefore, a bibliographic review was carried out in nine databases and in a specific journal focused on publications from the Kinanthopometry perspective, since this is an element to legitimize a scientific discipline. Only two studies dealing with this topic were selected. Given such a gap in the literature, three interviews with professors who organized the Physical Education (PE) course laboratories, as well as a newspaper report from the period, were used in the study. Different names have been associated with the scientific field of human composition assessment throughout history, as well as formulating different body perceptions, such as Biometrics, Anthropometry and kinanthropometry. Each of these factors determine relationships with the involved socio-cultural context. Such a complexity to understand a conjecture within a historical time expands the space available for analyses. In the 1960s, the term kinanthropometry emerged in foreign countries as a new way of interpreting human body composition assessments linked to knowledge in the PE field based on movement and anatomy. This term was imported by Brazilian researchers after their contact with scientists in USA and Canada, since it offered the possibility of acquiring new representations for research in the PE field back in the 1970s.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097801911&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e75281; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-00372020000100504&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbcdh/v22/1415-8426-rbcdh-22-e75281.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-00372020000100504&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1980-00372020000100504&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-00372020000100504; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1980-00372020000100504; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e75281; https://www.scielo.br/j/rbcdh/a/FQJWbpYNgsxQXxGcNkCsL3c/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know