Technosociality and health promotion in the daily lives of primary care users: A scoping review
Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, ISSN: 1980-265X, Vol: 30
2021
- 55Usage
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Objective: to map available evidence on the use of technologies by Primary Health Care users in the context of health promotion. Method: this is a scoping review according to Joanna Briggs Institute, and the recommendations of the international guide Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews were followed. The PCC strategy (participants, concept and context) was used. The search in the databases was carried out from January to April 2020. Rresults: a total of 5,267 studies were retrieved and 28 articles were selected for review. The article origin was diverse, with the largest number being from the United States of America (7), the predominant language is English, the year was 2018 and the level of evidence 2. Studies show that users obtain benefits in health care through the use of technologies. Conclusion: health interventions, using technology, positively impact people’s behavior and lifestyle, focusing on the prevention and control of chronic diseases. It is noteworthy that technologies used in isolation cannot overcome behavioral barriers and their use does not replace one-to-one care and monitoring.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121037255&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2020-0675; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072021000100509&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v30/1980-265X-tce-30-e20200675.pdf; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072021000100509&lng=en&tlng=en; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-07072021000100509&lng=en&tlng=en; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072021000100509; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-07072021000100509; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072021000100509&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-07072021000100509&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072021000100509; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-07072021000100509; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2020-0675; https://www.scielo.br/j/tce/a/vn7Zjz3JJGQWyQpkLHTsyRj/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know