TEACHER TRAINERS’ COLLABORATIVE REFLECTIONS BASED ON AN INTER-INSTITUTIONAL SELF-STUDY
Cadernos de Pesquisa, ISSN: 1980-5314, Vol: 54
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
This paper presents an exploratory self-study involving five teacher trainers from different countries, specialized in the teaching of science and mathematics. To characterize the community’s reflective processes, discussion groups were held during which recordings of their lessons were analyzed. Through a content analysis, we identified two types of interventions that facilitated dialogical reflection: questions leading to a deeper understanding of the practice of others and evaluations concerning its significant aspects. Moreover, the classroom pedagogical features associated to some theoretical elements seem to characterize the reflection content. Such reflective processes can give new meaning to the teacher trainers’ practice and show potential for professional development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85196297048&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980531410065; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-15742024000100608&tlng=es; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-15742024000100608&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-15742024000100608&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-15742024000100608; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-15742024000100608; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980531410065; https://www.scielo.br/j/cp/a/G4YmKdFvHq8KhbRpdb9sCjt/?lang=es
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know