Therapeutic potential and use of medicinal plants in an area of the Caatinga in the state of Ceará, northeastern Brazil
Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, ISSN: 1983-084X, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 912-930
2014
- 58Citations
- 62,693Usage
- 197Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Medicinal plants among riverside Community Health Agents: knowledge, use, form of preparation and indication/Plantas medicinais entre Agentes Comunitarios de Saude Ribeirinhos: conhecimento, uso, forma de preparacao e indicacao/Plantas medicinales entre l
Introduction The use of plants for medicinal purposes is a widespread and documented practice dating back to the early civilizations (1). Data from the World
Article Description
This study is about an ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants, checking the versatility of the species used and the consensus of use and/or knowledge among informants from the Aratama District, in the municipality of Assaré, state of Ceará, Brazil. The ethnobotanical information was obtained through structured interviews and semi-structured interviews with local residents. Approximately, 116 species were mentioned for medicinal purposes, belonging to 103 genera and 58 families, especially Fabaceae (10ssp.), Asteraceae (7spp.) and Lamiaceae (6spp.). Among the surveyed species, Mentha spicata L., Rosmarinus officinalis L., Allium sativum L. and Bauhinia cheilantha (Bong.) Ximenea americana L. stood out as the most versatile in the community. The therapeutic indications mentioned were grouped into 16 categories of body systems; the mental and behavioral disorders, disorders or pain not defined, disorder of the respiratory system, skin diseases and subcutaneous tissue disorder, and disorder of the sensory system (ears) showed greater agreement among informants in the use of species to treat a specific body system. The results showed a high species richness of the medicinal flora present in the Brazilian Caatinga. Thus, it is necessary to intensify and consolidate studies assessing the chemical and pharmacological properties of these species.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84916601655&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-084x/13_059; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-05722014000400018&lng=pt&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpm/v16n4/a18v16n4.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-05722014000400018&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1516-05722014000400018&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-05722014000400018; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1516-05722014000400018; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-084x/13_059; https://www.scielo.br/j/rbpm/a/k8cDGCLh3WTwtBtYjttCSfs/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know