Cross-cultural adaptation and content validity of the Adverse Events Associated with Nursing Practices instrument
Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem, ISSN: 1983-1447, Vol: 44, Page: e20230080
2023
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: To conduct the cross-cultural adaptation and evaluate the evidence of content validity of the Adverse Events Associated with Nursing Practices instrument in the Brazilian context. Method: Psychometric study, conducted between June 2021 and February 2023, following the stages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System protocol. Semantic, idiomatic, experimental and conceptual equivalences were evaluated, along with content validity evidence, considering Content Validity Ratio (CVR) parameters, with the participation of 25 experts. Results: A Brazilian version with 55 items was obtained, demonstrating good linguistic equivalence to the original version (agreement rate=99.2%), and adjustments in the items writing. CVR values remained above 0.60. Cognitive testing indicated good understanding, confirmed by the 31 participants in this stage, with a short application time (average = 17 minutes). Conclusion: The final version of the instrument showed good linguistic equivalence, strong evidence of content validity and a good response process in the Brazilian context.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178457156&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20230080.en; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38055462; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-14472023000100488&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-14472023000100488&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1983-14472023000100488&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-14472023000100488; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1983-14472023000100488; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-14472023000100488&lng=en&tlng=en; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1983-14472023000100488&lng=en&tlng=en; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-14472023000100488; http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1983-14472023000100488; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20230080.en; https://www.scielo.br/j/rgenf/a/v5SP8gW54xQmJz8sSGk7DBM/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know