Questionnaire on the mental evocation of images, movements, and activities (CEMIMA): analysis of its psychometric properties
Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN: 2526-8910, Vol: 30
2022
- 1Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Introduction: Graduated motor imaging has shown very promising results in the field of rehabilitation as a complement to other conventional treatment modalities. The potential benefit of techniques related to the mental representation of movements and activities is determined by the ability of the subject to evoke mental images. The Mental Evocation of Images, Movements and Activities Questionnaire (CEMIMA) was designed to evaluate the evocation capacity of the upper limbs specifically. Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of CEMIMA in a sample of healthy adults. Method: In a sample of 75 subjects (53.3% women and 46.7% men), with a mean age of 40 years, internal consistency, intra-rater reliability (test-retest), and concurrent criterion validity of the instrument under study with the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R) were analyzed. Results: The CEMIMA showed good internal consistency both in the total scale (α = .82) and in their respective subscales of evocation (α = .89) and sensation (α = .83); adequate intra-rater reliability with high correlations between test and retest scores, both in the total scale (r = .84), as well as in the evocation (r = .91) and sensation (r = .92) subscales; and concurrent validity with MIQ-R (r = .63) and its corresponding subscales. Conclusion: The CEMIMA seems to be a valid and reliable measure of the mental evocation capacity of sensation and movement-image in healthy adult subjects.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129472649&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao23423096; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2526-89102022000100218&tlng=es; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2526-89102022000100218&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2526-89102022000100218&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2526-89102022000100218; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2526-89102022000100218; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoao23423096; https://www.scielo.br/j/cadbto/a/F4VYP8fTLKhYjRk63mWfc9G/?lang=es
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know