Punção biópsia aspirativa (PBA) com agulha fina no diagnóstico diferencial de patologias da mama
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, ISSN: 1806-9339, Vol: 20, Issue: 4, Page: 209-213
1998
- 26,193Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A punção biópsia aspirativa (PBA) é um método simples e isento de complicações, de grande valor em mastologia. Sua acurácia diagnóstica pode sofrer a influência de diversos fatores, dos quais podemos destacar a experiência do médico que a realiza. Com o objetivo de verificar a eficácia da PBA realizada por ginecologistas gerais, foram estudadas 341 pacientes correlacionando-se os resultados da PBA com o diagnóstico histopatológico da lesão mamária. Obtivemos sensibilidade de 70,87%, especificidade de 70,58%, valor preditivo positivo de 92,40%, valor preditivo negativo de 89,36% e acurácia de 70,67%. Concluímos que a PBA é de grande auxílio na abordagem das lesões mamárias e pode ser realizada adequadamente por ginecologistas gerais. O método, contudo, pode apresentar erros de diagnóstico. Não recomendamos, portanto, o uso do resultado da PBA como diagnóstico definitivo, devendo este resultado ser interpretado no contexto do diagnóstico clínico e mamográfico da lesão mamária.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72031998000400006&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbgo/v20n4/a06v20n4.pdf; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-72031998000400006; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72031998000400006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72031998000400006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72031998000400006; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72031998000400006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-72031998000400006; https://www.scielo.br/j/rbgo/a/B54FYJ9VZRrMv3cYkYgbkDS/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know