Chemical and spectroscopical characterization of humic acids from two South Brazilian coals of different ranks
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, ISSN: 0103-5053, Vol: 13, Issue: 2, Page: 177-182
2002
- 53Citations
- 9,148Usage
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Humic acids (HA) extracted from two coals of different ranks, from their regenerated samples and from a nitrated sample, were characterized by elemental analysis and by infra-red (FTIR), solid state C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and eletronic paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopies. The low rank coal HA presented higher C and lower O contents, higher C/N and lower H/C and O/C ratios than high rank coal HA. NMR results showed that both samples were more aromatic and less carboxylic than common soil HA. Those characteristics may limit the coal HA efficiency as an appropriate soil conditioner and fertilizer. The regeneration process did not produce major alterations in the coal HA, except a decrease of the free radical content as determined by EPR spectroscopy. Probably, the regeneration conditions and time were not adequate to oxidize the samples. The obtained FTIR spectra were much alike, except that from the nitrated sample, where the absorption band at 1533 cm confirms the presence of nitrated groups. The nitration process increased the N content and reduced the C/N ratio to values comparable to those reported for soil HA, but the aromaticity still remained high and the carboxylic content was lowered after the procedure.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036374934&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-50532002000200008; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532002000200008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jbchs/v13n2/9100.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532002000200008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0103-50532002000200008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532002000200008; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0103-50532002000200008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-50532002000200008; https://www.scielo.br/j/jbchs/a/sbrC6PMbjhVMW3bpmPdg9vR/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know