Relationship between nutritional status and the clinical outcomes of patients with and without neoplasms according to multiple correspondence analysis
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, ISSN: 1678-4219, Vol: 54, Issue: 2, Page: 148-155
2017
- 13Citations
- 2,759Usage
- 58Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background – For many years, many studies have reported undesirable outcomes that may occur during the hospital stay of patients diagnosed with malnutrition or even at some nutritional risk. Objective – To investigate the relationship between nutritional status and clinical outcomes during hospital stay using the multiple correspondence analysis technique. Methods – This cross-sectional study included 600 patients with and without neoplasms. The following data were collected: subjective global assessment, nutritional indicators, nutritional risk screening, anthropometric data (body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MUAMC), triceps skinfold thickness (TST), recent weight loss (RWL)), and habitual energy intake (HEI/ER <75%). The clinical outcomes of interest were complications, length of hospital stay (LOHS), and death. The data were analyzed by the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test at a significance level of 5%. Multiple correspondence analysis was used for the multivariate data analysis. Results – The multiple correspondence analysis map for the patients with neoplasms showed that the following characteristics were associated and represented by death, complications, and a greater likelihood of LOHS ≥7 days: underweight according to BMI; TST, MUAC, and MUAMC ≤15th percentile; malnutrition according to the subjective global assessment; at nutritional risk according to the nutritional risk screening; being male; age ≥60 years; and HEI/ER <75%. The multiple correspondence analysis map for the patients without neoplasms showed that the following characteristics were associated and represented by death: underweight according to BMI; TST ≤15th percentile; malnutrition according to the subjective global assessment; and at nutritional risk according to the nutritional risk screening. Complications and LOHS ≥7 days represented the categories male, no recent weight loss, HEI/ER <75%, MUAC and MUAMC ≤15th percentile, TST between the 15th and 85th percentiles, and age <60 years. Conclusion – The results of this study confirm an association between unsatisfactory nutritional indicators and undesirable clinical outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85020074742&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0004-2803.201700000-05; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28198916; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032017000200148&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0004-28032017000200148&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032017000200148; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0004-28032017000200148; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032017005001105&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0004-28032017005001105&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032017005001105; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0004-28032017005001105; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0004-2803.201700000-05; https://www.scielo.br/j/ag/a/XpyQyMnBhyysYPLKMTMdt9y/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know