Cultural adaptation of an instrument to assess physical fitness in cardiac patients
Revista de Saude Publica, ISSN: 0034-8910, Vol: 45, Issue: 2, Page: 276-285
2011
- 12Citations
- 25,998Usage
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: To validate the content and to evaluate the reliability of the Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire instrument, culturally adapted for use in the Brazilian population of cardiac patients. Methods: The instrument was translated and back-translated and subsequently analyzed by a committee of judges to evaluate its semantic-idiomatic and cultural equivalences. Physical activities were replaced when indicated in the instrument, but uncommon in the daily life of the target population. Another committee of specialists analyzed the metabolic equivalence of replaced activities. The proportion of agreement of evaluation of the judges was quantified by the Content Validity Index. The pre-test was performed in two stages (n1 and n2=15). Reliability was assessed using the test-retest (interval of 7-15 days, n = 50). Results: In the evaluation of semantic-idiomatic and cultural equivalences, items with a Content Validity Index < 1 were reviewed until consensus among the judges was obtained. The second committee found 100% of agreement in the analysis of metabolic equivalence between original and replaced activities. Test-retest analysis indicated a Kappa coefficient of agreement (k = 0.86; (p<0.001), suggesting temporal stability of the instrument. Conclusions: The Brazilian version of the Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire showed evidence of reliability, according to the temporal stability criterion and adequate cultural content. © Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79953853348&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102011005000006; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21344124; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102011000200006&lng=pt&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rsp/v45n2/2147.pdf; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102011000200006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-89102011000200006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102011000200006; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-89102011000200006; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102011000200006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-89102011000200006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102011000200006; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0034-89102011000200006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102011005000006; https://www.scielo.br/j/rsp/a/BkBPSKJvVT5t8HrhK9GYCms/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know