The efficiency of concentration methods used to detect enteric viruses in anaerobically digested sludge
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, ISSN: 0074-0276, Vol: 108, Issue: 1, Page: 77-83
2013
- 17Citations
- 10,245Usage
- 79Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef9
- Scielo1
- Usage10,245
- Full Text Views9,508
- 9,508
- Abstract Views737
- 737
- Captures79
- Readers79
- 79
Article Description
The presence of enteric viruses in biosolids can be underestimated due to the inefficient methods (mainly molecular methods) used to recover the viruses from these matrices. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate the different methods used to recover adenoviruses (AdV), rotavirus species A (RVA), norovirus genogroup II (NoV GII) and the hepatitis A virus (HAV) from biosolid samples at a large urban wastewater treatment plant in Brazil after they had been treated by mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for spiking experiments to compare the detection limits of feasible methods, such as beef extract elution and ultracentrifugation. Tests were performed to detect the inhibition levels and the bacteriophage PP7 was used as an internal control. The results showed that the inhibitors affected the efficiency of the PCR reaction and that beef extract elution is a suitable method for detecting enteric viruses, mainly AdV from biosolid samples. All of the viral groups were detected in the biosolid samples: AdV (90%), RVA, NoV GII (45%) and HAV (18%), indicating the viruses' resistance to the anaerobic treatment process. This is the first study in Brazil to detect the presence of RVA, AdV, NoV GII and HAV in anaerobically digested sludge, highlighting the importance of adequate waste management.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875444383&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762013000100013; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23440119; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762013000100013&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/mioc/v108n1/13.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0074-02762013000100013&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762013000100013; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0074-02762013000100013; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762013000100013; https://www.scielo.br/j/mioc/a/DBMbRCKggKgxdpVbTyWGZmD/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know