Production and nutrient accumulation of common bean cultivars under competition with weed
Planta Daninha, ISSN: 0100-8358, Vol: 37
2019
- 1Citations
- 822Usage
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Improper management of weeds is one of the causes of low bean yield, as it is very susceptible to interference due to their slow initial growth. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of dayflower on grain yield and nutrient accumulation of bean cultivars. The experiment was carried out in a screened house, in 5 L pots, in a 2 x 4 factorial scheme. Factor 1 corresponded to the presence or absence of weeds, and factor 2 bean cultivars: BRS Pontal, BRS Agreste, BRS Ametista and BRS Estilo. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with five replications. The coexistence of bean and weed was maintained throughout the crop cycle. Chlorophyll content, number of pods per plant, number of grains per plant, nutrients contents (N-nitrogen, P-phosphorus, K-potassium, Ca-calcium, Mg-magnesium, Mn-manganese, Fe-iron and Zn-zinc) in grains were evaluated. Competition with weeds negatively influenced chlorophyll content, number of pods, yield and N content in grains. The interaction was significant to P, Mg and Fe contents in grains, demonstrating that competition with weeds may impair allocation of these nutrients, resulting in grains of inferior nutritional quality. The cultivar BRS Agreste was more efficient to accumulate P and Mg in grains in competition with dayflower.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075909992&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100151; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100156&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pd/v37/0100-8358-PD-37-e019214474.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100156&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-83582019000100156&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100156; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-83582019000100156; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100151; https://www.scielo.br/j/pd/a/jSFXWNxzmxqWjTNn8p3dw4F/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know