Effect of proximal terminal colostomy on the healing of colonie anastomosis in rats
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, ISSN: 1678-2674, Vol: 17, Issue: 6, Page: 398-402
2002
- 7,609Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To evaluate the effects of the proximal-terminal colostomy on the healing of colonic anastomosis in rats. Methods:6 rats were allocated into two groups: control group (C) with 12 rats subjected to colonic ressectinon and primary anastomosis; colostomy group (CZ) with 24 rats subjected to the same procedure done in the group C, but complemented with a proximal-terminal colostomy. Anastomosis healing was evaluated at the 2 and 7 postoperative days (PO) by the presence of anastomotic dehiscence and mucosal line, adhesions, bursting pressure, and histologic examination. Results: There was no anastomotic dehiscence in the two groups. Adhesions were more intense in group C at the 7 PO. At both groups, the intestinal rupture was always on the anastomotic line at the 2 PO; at the 7 PO, most of ruptures happened on the colonic zone out of the anastomotic line (100% of group C and 70% of group CZ). No significant difference was noticied in the other healing anastomotic variables. Conclusion: There is no difference in the healing of colonic anastomosis related to the presence or abscence of a proximal colostomy in rats.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=52649085330&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-86502002000600008; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502002000600008&lng=pt&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/acb/v17n6/13052.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502002000600008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-86502002000600008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502002000600008; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-86502002000600008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-86502002000600008; https://www.scielo.br/j/acb/a/JM6LygMqp6QKsJv9qHmHwtb/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know