Comparison of the prognostic value of platelet-based prognostic models in patients with malignant hepatic tumors after tace therapy
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, ISSN: 1678-2674, Vol: 34, Issue: 7, Page: e201900710
2019
- 3Citations
- 982Usage
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Usage982
- Full Text Views830
- 830
- Abstract Views152
- 152
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Purpose: To investigate the prognostic value of 17 platelet-based prognostic scores in patients with malignant hepatic tumors after TACE therapy. Methods: In total, 92 patients were divided into death group and survival group according to long-term follow-up results. The AUC was calculated to determine the optimal cut-off values for predicting prognosis. To determine better prognostic models, platelet-based models were analyzed separately after being showed as binary according to cut-off values. Cumulative survival rates of malignant hepatic tumors were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and differences were analyzed by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify platelet-based prognostic scores associated with overall survival. Results: Univariate analysis showed that APGA, APRI, FIB-4, FibroQ, GUCI, King’s score, Lok index, PAPAS, cirrhosis, number of tumors, vascular cancer embolus, AFP, ALP and APTT were significantly related to prognosis. A multivariate analysis showed that the APGA, number of tumors, ALP and APTT were independently associated with overall survival. Conclusion: This study showed that the APGA, a platelet-based prognostic score, was an independent marker of prognosis in patients with malignant hepatic tumors after TACE and was superior to the other platelet-based prognostic scores in terms of prognostic ability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072291418&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190070000010; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531530; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502019000700209&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502019000700209&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-86502019000700209&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502019000700209; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-86502019000700209; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190070000010; https://www.scielo.br/j/acb/a/WSKHxNtZhGmLWZKZXNNxpnv/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know