Estimates of DNA damage by the comet assay in the direct-developing frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei(Anura, Eleutherodactylidae)
Genetics and Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1415-4757, Vol: 34, Issue: 4, Page: 681-688
2011
- 12Citations
- 15,023Usage
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef7
- Usage15,023
- Full Text Views13,252
- 13,252
- Abstract Views1,771
- 1,771
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
The aim of this study was to use the Comet assay to assess genetic damage in the direct-developing frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei. A DNA diffusion assay was used to evaluate the effectiveness of alkaline, enzymatic and alkaline/enzymatic treatments for lysing E. johnstoneiblood cells and to determine the amount of DNA strand breakage associated with apoptosis and necrosis. Cell sensitivity to the mutagens bleomycin (BLM) and 4-nitro-quinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) was also assessed using the Comet assay, as was the assay reproducibility. Alkaline treatment did not lyse the cytoplasmic and nuclear membranes of E. johnstoneiblood cells, whereas enzymatic digestion with proteinase K (40 ng/mL) yielded naked nuclei. The contribution of apoptosis and necrosis (assessed by the DNA diffusion assay) to DNA damage was estimated to range from 0% to 8%. BLM and 4NQO induced DNA damage in E. johnstonei blood cells at different concentrations and exposure times. Dose-effect curves with both mutagens were highly reproducible and showed consistently low coefficients of variation (CV ≤ 10%). The results are discussed with regard to the potential use of the modified Comet assay for assessing the exposure of E. johnstoneito herbicides in ecotoxicological studies. © 2011, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=82355161231&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1415-47572011005000048; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22215974; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572011000400022&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/gmb/v34n4/2011-122.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1415-47572011000400022&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572011000400022; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1415-47572011000400022; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1415-47572011005000048; https://www.scielo.br/j/gmb/a/mPQhKYhjLDCrW49rHgTwWBM/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know