Evaluation of chemical additives in the fermentation profile, nutritive value, and dry matters losses of sugar cane silages (Saccharum officinarum L.)
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, ISSN: 1516-3598, Vol: 37, Issue: 9, Page: 1555-1563
2008
- 35Citations
- 18,327Usage
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effects of chemical additives in the dry matter losses, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of sugar cane silages. The trial was carried out in a completely randomized experimental design with four replicates per treatment. The following additives were applied to the fresh forage during the ensiling: control (without additive), L. buchneri, calcium oxide and calcium carbonate,1.0 and 1.5% (wet basis) each, and calcium sulfate 1.0% (wet basis), all of them diluted in to 40 L of water per ton of fresh forage. The variables analyzed were: total and gaseous dry matter losses, dry matter recovery, fermentation end products, and nutritive value. The use of calcium oxide or calcium carbonate were effective in reducing dry matter losses and gaseous production and had the highest dry matter recovery rate. Both silages had also low ethanol content and, as a result, had greater concentrations of residual water soluble carbohydrates and lactic acid. The addition of calcium oxide and calcium carbonate at the time of ensiling produced silages with higher nutritive value compared with all other treatments, due to the increase of ash content and dry matter and organic digestibility and also, by reducing the fiber content. The crude protein content range was similar to the values observed in the fresh forage. The treatments with L. buchneri and calcium sulfate were ineffective in altering the fermentation process of sugar cane silages and became similar to the control silages. In summary, the overall analysis pointed out that the treatment containing calcium oxide and calcium carbonate improved the fermentation and storage process. © 2008 Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=54349107248&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1516-35982008000900006; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982008000900006&lng=pt&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbz/v37n9/a06v37n9.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982008000900006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1516-35982008000900006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982008000900006; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1516-35982008000900006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1516-35982008000900006; https://www.scielo.br/j/rbz/a/ZZMncHzYFXW4CGLXfR77FRc/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know