Use of maximal running distance performed on Hoff test for anaerobic threshold prediction in soccer
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, ISSN: 1517-8692, Vol: 19, Issue: 4, Page: 267-270
2013
- 6Citations
- 22,342Usage
- 30Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: The purpose of the study was to verify the use of maximal running distance performed on Hoff test to predict anaerobic threshold speed (sAnT). Methods: Ten young soccer players (age of 17 ± 1 years and body mass of 64.3 ± 2.1 kg) were subjects of the study. The subjects performed 12-min test, lactate minimum test to estimate anaerobic threshold speed and a field test called Hoff. The purpose of Hoff test was to cover the maximum distance during a period of 10min moving a soccer ball through the track by dribbling. Results: The distance covered during 12-min was 2673.2 ± 64.7 m, the sAnT was 11.6 ± 0.3 km.h and distance covered during test Hoff test was 1458.7 ± 49.6 m. The distance covered during Hoff test was not significantly correlated with sAnT (r = -0.20; P > 0.05) and distance covered during 12-min test (r = -0.15; P > 0.05). The sAnT did not differ of speed correspondent 90% at 12-min speed and they were statistically correlated (r = 0.65). Conclusion: Thus, we concluded that maximal distance covered during Hoff test cannot provides a valid prediction of the anaerobic threshold speed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84885214748&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1517-86922013000400008; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922013000400008&lng=pt&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbme/v19n4/08.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922013000400008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1517-86922013000400008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922013000400008; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1517-86922013000400008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1517-86922013000400008; https://www.scielo.br/j/rbme/a/vRpyv4nX7ZzzFXyDZG5PyTL/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know