Editorial comment
International Braz J Urol, ISSN: 1677-5538, Vol: 36, Issue: 6, Page: 664-null
2010
- 40Citations
- 53,279Usage
- 161Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations40
- Citation Indexes39
- 39
- CrossRef15
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Usage53,279
- Full Text Views52,645
- 52,645
- Abstract Views634
- 634
- Captures161
- Readers161
- 161
Review Description
In spite of considerable efforts to identify effective treatments for urolithiasis, this is a goal yet to be achieved. This review summarizes experimental and clinical data evaluating the effect of the plant Phyllanthus niruri, a plant with worldwide distribution, as a potential agent to prevent and/or to treat urolithiasis The review is based on data from the literature and on the results obtained by our group from either in vivo/in vitro experiments or clinical studies. Phyllanthus niruri has been shown to interfere with many stages of stone formation, reducing crystals aggregation, modifying their structure and composition as well as altering the interaction of the crystals with tubular cells leading to reduced subsequent endocytosis. The clinical beneficial effects of Phyllanthus niruri may be related to ureteral relaxation, helping to eliminate calculi or to clear fragments following lithotripsy, or also to a putative reduction of the excretion of urinary crystallization promoters such as calcium. No adverse renal, cardiovascular, neurological or toxic effects have been detected in either of these studies. Altogether, these studies suggest a preventive effect of Phyllanthus niruri in stone formation or elimination, but still longer-term randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm its therapeutic properties.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79251477867&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382010000600002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79251529541&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21176271; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000600002&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ibju/v36n6/v36n6a02.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1677-55382010000600002&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000600002; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1677-55382010000600002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382010000600002; https://www.scielo.br/j/ibju/a/RpHKxJmzv63t4w3yf8rxSNt/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know