Degree of satisfaction with the endoscopic treatment of lumbar disc herniation
Coluna/ Columna, ISSN: 1808-1851, Vol: 18, Issue: 1, Page: 43-46
2019
- 1,282Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: To evaluate the degree of patient satisfaction and complications after endoscopic surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 94 patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing endoscopic lumbar discectomy through the MacNab questionnaire and four subjective questions related to the procedure. Results: Approximately 82% of the patients had good and excellent results, and 91.4% reported being satisfied with the surgical result obtained with endoscopy. The rate of complications with the method was 9.5%, with recurrent disc herniation being the most common complication (5.4% of cases). Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery proved to be an effective and safe method, and an alternative to conventional open surgery. Level of evidence; III. Therapeutic studies - Investigation of treatment results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85065235463&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120191801185352; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100043&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/coluna/v18n1/2177-014X-coluna-18-01-0043.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100043&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1808-18512019000100043&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100043; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1808-18512019000100043; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120191801185352; https://www.scielo.br/j/coluna/a/4FCfsyD9SJGxgfDXdWfDMmd/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know