Cross-cultural adaptation of the 3×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Sport in Brazil
Motriz. Revista de Educacao Fisica, ISSN: 1980-6574, Vol: 28
2022
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Aim: Adapt the 3×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Sport in a Brazilian sporting context and examine its psychometric properties. Methods: A total of 211 Brazilian athletes of seven different sports responded to the adapted instrument. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis supported the measurement model of the 3×2 Achievement Goal Model with some error correlations and invariance of the measurement model across gender, but not for the type of sport and context of the application. In terms of internal consistency, "task-avoidance" and "self-avoidance" goals did not reach the values of accepted criteria. Conclusion: This study supported the use of the 3×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Sport in the Brazilian sport domain and encourages further studies to improve its reliability. Finally, the findings are discussed suggesting cultural differences in the understanding of some items between Brazilian athletes and those from other countries.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142142516&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1980-657420220003422; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742022000101203&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742022000101203&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1980-65742022000101203&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742022000101203; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1980-65742022000101203; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1980-657420220003422; https://www.scielo.br/j/motriz/a/zbMXYR3PLGKZYC3QYD8gbBK/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know