A Cytogenetic Profile of Radiation Damage
Radiation Research, ISSN: 1938-5404, Vol: 191, Issue: 1, Page: 1-19
2019
- 8Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef3
- Captures7
- Readers7
Review Description
Most of the important biological effects associated with the exposure to ionizing radiations are mirrored at the chromosomal level. In all cases, changes in the levels of cytogenetic effects are associated with changes in absorbed dose, dose rate and radiation quality. Some of the complexities associated with the quantitative description of such changes in response can be circumvented by appealing to concepts embodied in what has been called the "mean inactivation dose". Additional metrics designed to provide LET-dependent "signatures" of damage have been employed with moderate degrees of success. These, along with some alternative approaches, are discussed in an effort to stimulate discussion, and to further work leading to a better understanding of mechanisms involved in the production and significance of chromosome aberrations after exposure to ionizing radiations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85060177014&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/rr15205.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406718; https://bioone.org/journals/radiation-research/volume-191/issue-1/RR15205.1/A-Cytogenetic-Profile-of-Radiation-Damage/10.1667/RR15205.1.full; https://dx.doi.org/10.1667/rr15205.1; https://bioone.org/access-suspended
Radiation Research Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know