Morpho-volumetric assessment of the right ventricle: A comparison between three-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance
Recenti Progressi in Medicina, ISSN: 0034-1193, Vol: 104, Issue: 11, Page: 559-563
2013
- 2Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
The morpho-volumetric assessment of the right ventricle (RV) is useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of many congenital and acquired cardiovascular diseases. The complexity of the right ventricular shape does not allow an adequate and satisfactory evaluation of the RV. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography is the most used tool for the assessment of RV function, as it is a noninvasive, reproducible and widespread technique, but the geometric assumptions required for measurement of RV volumes reduce its accuracy. At present, cardiac magnetic resonance is the gold standard for the evaluation of RV volumes because it does not need any assumption and is reproducible, though not always available. This imaging tool allows to follow-up patients and to monitor drug therapy. On the other hand, three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography overcomes several limitations of 2D echocardiography, in that it provides an estimation of RV volumes obtained through a real 3D data set, obtaining sections which cannot be technically achieved with 2D echocardiography. It is therefore useful to compare data on RV volumes and function obtained with 3D echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance, mainly considering the lower costs and higher portability and availability of echocardiography.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know