Effect of surface treatments on the interfacial strength for metal/composite hybrid joints
Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, ISSN: 1304-4915, Vol: 37, Issue: 2, Page: 1033-1045
2022
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Purpose: This study is about determination of adhesive bonding between composite and different metals with various surface treatments and reviews the surface wettability properties and roughness of metals after surface treatments and shear strengths of the hybrid metal/composite joints conducting single lap shear test. Theory and Methods: Within this study, different metal types with various surface treatments such as cold working, laser texturing and sand blasting, are adhesively bonded to one type of composite. Aluminum 2024 T6, AISI 304 Stainless Steel and Titanium Ti-6Al-4V are the metal types that are coupled with polyamide composite material. The hybrid structure of the differently roughed surfaces of Aluminum, Stainless Steel and Titanium metal materials and PA 66 are tested by single lap shear tests. The shear strength values of these adhesive bonded couples are reported in association with their roughness and wettability properties. Results: The results showed that although the wettability values expected to be increased proportionally with roughness on all these surfaces; in fact, it varies according to the roughness type as it was seen on the sandblasting sample. Considering the results of the droplet contact angle, it is not possible to establish a relationship between shear strength and contact angle similar to that of surface roughness and shear strength. Conclusion: It is concluded that Al2024 sample with 15 Ra roughness forming a hybrid joint with PA 66 exhibited the best shear strength (8 MPa) among the metal samples exposed to different surface treatments.
Bibliographic Details
Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know