Prediction of forming limit diagrams for steel sheets with an artificial neural network and comparison with empirical and theoretical models
Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, ISSN: 2149-4088, Vol: 10, Issue: 2, Page: 651-677
2024
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The automotive industry heavily relies on forming limit diagrams (FLDs) as essential tools for ensuring the quality and manufacturability of sheet metal components. However, accurately determining FLDs can be complex and resource-intensive due to the numerous material properties and variables involved. To address this challenge, this research employs an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict FLDs for sheet metals, explicitly focusing on the automotive sector. The study begins by gathering material properties, including sheet thickness, yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, uniform elongation, hardening exponent, and strength coefficient. These properties serve as crucial inputs for the ANN model. Sensitivity analysis is then conducted to discern how each parameter influences FLD predictions. The ANN model is meticulously constructed, with a 6-15-22-3 structure, and subsequently trained to predict FLDs. The results are promising, as the model achieves an exceptional R-value of 0.99995, indicating high accuracy in its predictions. Comparative analysis is carried out by pitting the ANN-generated FLDs against experimental data. The findings reveal that the ANN model predicts FLDs with remarkable precision, exhibiting only a 3.4% difference for the FLD0 value. This level of accuracy is particularly significant in the context of automotive manufacturing, where even minor deviations can lead to substantial product defects or manufacturing inefficiencies. It offers a swift and reliable way of predicting FLDs, which can be instrumental in optimising manufacturing processes, reducing material waste, and ensuring product quality. In conclusion, this research contributes to the automotive manufacturing sector by providing a robust and efficient method for predicting FLDs.
Bibliographic Details
MIM Research Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know