Who owns nature? About the rights of nature
Estudios de Filosofia (Colombia), ISSN: 2256-358X, Vol: 2022, Issue: 65, Page: 49-68
2022
- 95Usage
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Property rights are often seen as a gateway to the destruction of nature. In view of the ecological crisis, criticism of property rights is therefore becoming louder and louder. On the one hand, rightly so, since global warming, resource depletion, global pollution and the loss of species have been made possible by the private ownership of natural assets. On the other hand, the criticism falls short. Even common and public property does not protect natural assets from being overexploited, resources depleted, and values extracted. Moreover, it is questionable whether nature would actually be better off today without any property regulation. A new understanding of property that does justice to natural goods is therefore needed. The article considers the rights of nature as a way to rethink property in this sense and explores reasons to give rights of nature a general validity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176725133&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.347573; https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/347573; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-36282022000100049&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-36282022000100049&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-36282022000100049; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-36282022000100049; https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.347573
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know