Procedural Behaviors of the Parties to which the Civil Procedure Code and the General Procedure Code Assign Probatory Consequences
Estudios de Derecho, ISSN: 2145-6151, Vol: 80, Issue: 176, Page: 84-108
2023
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Under the principle of procedural morality or loyalty, the parties must cooperate in producing evidence. Upon non-performance of such a duty, the legislator may choose to establish consequences of a probatory nature. In Colombia, in a civil process, these consequences will be the presumption of the occurrence of a fact or an indication of it. This article intends to identify the various regulatory assumptions that, in civil procedural law, assign probatory consequences to the parties’ behavior along the proceedings. An inventory of such behaviors includes those corresponding to failure by the parties and their attorneys in performing their duties; those resulting from not answering the claim or not answering it in due form; those resulting from non-attendance to meetings ruled; those derived from not returning the process docket; and those occurring on occasion of or during discovery.
Bibliographic Details
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know