Academic writing: Perceptions of students of human sciences and engineering sciences at a chilean university
Ikala, ISSN: 0123-3432, Vol: 25, Issue: 2, Page: 475-491
2020
- 16Citations
- 52Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper presents an exploratory cross-sectional quantitative study, the main goal of which was to know the perceptions about academic writing from two groups of student at a Chilean university. The first group was enrolled in a program in the field of human sciences (20 students in the Translation program) and the second was enrolled in Engineering Sciences (32 Engineering students). For this purpose, a Likert questionnaire was designed and applied, based on a scale to identify problems in academic writing and on the five dimensions covering the before, during and after academic writing (planning, textualization, revision, postponing writing, attitudes towards writing). The results show that students of Engineering Sciences perceive greater difficulties in writing than students from Humans Sciences. In the dimensions of textualization and revision, statistically significant differences were also observed between both groups. This demonstrates the need to teach writing in different specialized fields at the university.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088120808&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n02a02; https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/view/escritura-ciencias-humanas-ingenieria-chile; https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/download/escritura-ciencias-humanas-ingenieria-chile/20802461; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-34322020000200475&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0123-34322020000200475&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-34322020000200475; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0123-34322020000200475; https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n02a02
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know