Design and Validation of the Instrument to Assess Narrative Quality in Fictional Oral Stories Created with Attachment Script Assessment
Ikala, ISSN: 0123-3432, Vol: 26, Issue: 2, Page: 395-412
2021
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article reports the design and validation of the narrative quality assessment instrument (ecan, in Spanish), whose objective is to allow the valuation of fictional recounts that are produced orally and spontaneously. The phase of design involved the identification of the evaluation criteria, their operationalization and weighting. A pilot test and an interrater evaluation process allowed for its adjustment. Later, an empirical validation process was carried out on a corpus of 184 recounts produced by 66 Colombian mothers. Statistical analyzes, such as Cronbach alpha and inter-class coefficients, Chi Square, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (kmo) tests, Bartlett’s sphericity and a two-stage conglomerate analysis; revealed a high internal consistency, a very significant interrater reliability and a significant content validity. The analyses also showed that by using an adequate training, the ecan allows for an evaluation of the recounts without biases and errors, which makes the instrument not only reliable but also necessary to inquire about the quality of narrative discourse in diverse contexts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85106621133&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n2a07; https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/view/343961; https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/download/343961/20805377; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-34322021000200385&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0123-34322021000200385&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-34322021000200385; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0123-34322021000200385; https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n2a07
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know